Polish Sociological Review

361 papers and 915 indexed citations i.

About

The 361 papers published in Polish Sociological Review in the last decades have received a total of 915 indexed citations. Papers published in Polish Sociological Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (150 papers), Political Science and International Relations (119 papers) and Philosophy (38 papers) specifically the topics of Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (45 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (26 papers) and Social Issues in Poland (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Polish Sociological Review are Maria Halamska, Krzysztof Jaskułowski, Filip Wijkström, Henryk Domański, Kazimierz M. Słomczyński, Anna Domaradzka, Jan Domaradzki, Krzysztof Gorlach, Jonathan Kelley and Attila Ágh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Polish Sociological Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Polish Sociological Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Polish Sociological Review.

Countries where authors publish in Polish Sociological Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Polish Sociological Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Polish Sociological Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polish Sociological Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025