International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity
185 papers
receiving
863 citations
Peers
International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
Business and International Management32
Development53
Anthropology132
Education263
Sociology and Political Science357
Replace OBETS Revista de Ciencias Sociales with:
OBETS Revista de Ciencias SocialesSpain
AIBR Revista de Antropologia IberoamericanaMexico
Urban anthropology and studies of cultural systems and world economic developmentUnited States
Anthropology Southern AfricaSouth Africa
NómadasColombia
Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic StudiesUnited States
South African Review of SociologySouth Africa
Critical African StudiesUnited Kingdom
SpiritusUnited States
Antípoda Revista de Antropología y ArqueologíaColombia
International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarityrelative toOBETS Revista de Ciencias SocialesSpainOBETS Revista de Ciencias Sociales's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
OBETS Revista de Ciencias Sociales · 1×
×1.832/18BIM
×2.953/18DEVEL
×2.6132/51ANTHR
×1.7263/153EDUCA
×0.8357/429SPS
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity more than expected).
Fields of papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity.
About International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity
The 250 papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity usually cover Development (27 papers), Anthropology (50 papers), Business and International Management (6 papers), Sociology and Political Science (112 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (55 papers) specifically the topics of African cultural and philosophical studies (53 papers), African history and culture studies (31 papers), International Development and Aid (26 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (25 papers), South African History and Culture (25 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (21 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (20 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity are Godwell Nhamo, Verene A. Shepherd, D. Wadada Nabudere, Stella M. Nkomo, Cheryl Hendricks, Adams Bodomo, Paul Tiyambe Železa, Pascah Mungwini, Gregory Kamwendo and Alfred Maroyi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.