Police Practice and Research

957 papers and 10.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 957 papers published in Police Practice and Research in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Police Practice and Research usually cover Sociology and Political Science (634 papers), Political Science and International Relations (575 papers) and Health (131 papers) specifically the topics of Policing Practices and Perceptions (548 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (446 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (158 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Police Practice and Research are Jerry H. Ratcliffe, Boaz Ganor, David Weisburd, Jerome H. Skolnick, Jacinta M. Gau, Craig Paterson, Jeanne B. Stinchcomb, Otwin Marenin, David S. Wall and Martine B. Powell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Police Practice and Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Police Practice and Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Police Practice and Research.

Countries where authors publish in Police Practice and Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Police Practice and Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Police Practice and Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Police Practice and Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025