Annals of Thoracic Medicine

762 papers and 9.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 762 papers published in Annals of Thoracic Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Thoracic Medicine usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (429 papers), Physiology (161 papers) and Surgery (157 papers) specifically the topics of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (97 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (75 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Thoracic Medicine are Ahmed S. BaHammam, Siraj Wali, Abdulaziz H. Alzeer, GajananS Gaude, Esam H. Alhamad, Yaseen M. Arabi, Abdullah Alangari, Salim Baharoon, Hamdan Al‐Jahdali and Malay Sarkar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Thoracic Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Thoracic Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Thoracic Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Thoracic Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Thoracic Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Thoracic Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Thoracic Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025