Phytopathology Research

286 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 286 papers published in Phytopathology Research in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Phytopathology Research usually cover Plant Science (267 papers), Molecular Biology (91 papers) and Cell Biology (72 papers) specifically the topics of Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (132 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (72 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phytopathology Research are Xujun Chen, Han Wang, Cheng Li, Zejian Guo, Emerson M. Del Ponte, Dayong Li, Clive H. Bock, Hui Wang, Jayme Garcia Arnal Barbedo and Fengming Song.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Phytopathology Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Phytopathology Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phytopathology Research.

Countries where authors publish in Phytopathology Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phytopathology Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phytopathology Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phytopathology Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025