Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae

375 papers and 7.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 375 papers published in Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae usually cover Molecular Biology (127 papers), Pharmaceutical Science (70 papers) and Organic Chemistry (64 papers) specifically the topics of Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (46 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (38 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae are Annette G. Beck‐Sickinger, Gerd Folkers, Wayne D. Bowen, Sriram Vemuri, Christopher T. Rhodes, A. Carnat, Jean‐Louis Lamaison, Jürg Tschopp, Pascal Schneider and Hans Leuenberger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025