PET Clinics

744 papers and 6.8k indexed citations

About

The 744 papers published in PET Clinics in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations. Papers published in PET Clinics usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (479 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (197 papers) and Oncology (155 papers) specifically the topics of Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (361 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (172 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in PET Clinics are Habib Zaidi, Abass Alavi, Arman Rahmim, Monica Morrow, Rachel Sanford, Sandip Basu, Chau T. Dang, Tracy‐Ann Moo, Gary A. Ulaner and Rathan M. Subramaniam.

In The Last Decade

PET Clinics

702 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Fields of papers published in PET Clinics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in PET Clinics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in PET Clinics.

Countries where authors publish in PET Clinics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in PET Clinics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in PET Clinics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PET Clinics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026