International Review of Sociology

814 papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 814 papers published in International Review of Sociology in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in International Review of Sociology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (484 papers), Political Science and International Relations (177 papers) and Gender Studies (69 papers) specifically the topics of Social Policy and Reform Studies (65 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (49 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Review of Sociology are Russell J. Dalton, Zhengxu Wang, Niklas Luhmann, Leon Moosavi, Pierpaolo Donati, Christian Welzel, Linda Woodhead, Amy C. Alexander, Tally Katz‐Gerro and Bob Jessop.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Review of Sociology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Review of Sociology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Review of Sociology.

Countries where authors publish in International Review of Sociology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Review of Sociology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Review of Sociology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Review of Sociology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025