Performance Measurement and Metrics

356 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 356 papers published in Performance Measurement and Metrics in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Performance Measurement and Metrics usually cover Library and Information Sciences (142 papers), Information Systems (130 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (57 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (121 papers), Library Science and Administration (82 papers) and Web and Library Services (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Performance Measurement and Metrics are Roswitha Poll, S.M. Zabed Ahmed, James Self, Martha Kyrillidou, Colleen Cook, Roxanne Missingham, Rowena Cullen, Niels Ole Pors, Peter Brophy and Judith Broady‐Preston.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Performance Measurement and Metrics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Performance Measurement and Metrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Performance Measurement and Metrics.

Countries where authors publish in Performance Measurement and Metrics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Performance Measurement and Metrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Performance Measurement and Metrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Performance Measurement and Metrics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025