Polymer Testing

6.4k papers and 158.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.4k papers published in Polymer Testing in the last decades have received a total of 158.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Polymer Testing usually cover Polymers and Plastics (3.3k papers), Mechanics of Materials (1.6k papers) and Mechanical Engineering (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Polymer crystallization and properties (1.4k papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (1.3k papers) and Mechanical Behavior of Composites (813 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Polymer Testing are H. Ismail, Ali Akbar Yousefi, Roger H. Brown, Roger Rothon, Ali Salimi, Ji‐Zhao Liang, Nittaya Rattanasom, K. Van de Velde, Paul Kiekens and Fernanda M. B. Coutinho.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Polymer Testing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Polymer Testing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Polymer Testing.

Countries where authors publish in Polymer Testing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Polymer Testing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Polymer Testing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polymer Testing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025