Computational Particle Mechanics

837 papers and 8.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 837 papers published in Computational Particle Mechanics in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Computational Particle Mechanics usually cover Computational Mechanics (519 papers), Mechanics of Materials (335 papers) and Civil and Structural Engineering (260 papers) specifically the topics of Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions (294 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (211 papers) and Rock Mechanics and Modeling (150 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computational Particle Mechanics are Seiichi Koshizuka, Eugenio Oñate, Stefan Pirker, Paul W. Cleary, Esteban Rougier, Zhou Lei, Y.T. Feng, Jerzy Rojek, A. Munjiza and Christoph Kloss.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Computational Particle Mechanics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computational Particle Mechanics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computational Particle Mechanics.

Countries where authors publish in Computational Particle Mechanics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computational Particle Mechanics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computational Particle Mechanics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computational Particle Mechanics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025