Isokinetics and Exercise Science

1.0k papers and 8.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science in the last decades have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (667 papers), Biomedical Engineering (457 papers) and Surgery (264 papers) specifically the topics of Sports injuries and prevention (471 papers), Sports Performance and Training (465 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (278 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Isokinetics and Exercise Science are Richard W. Bohannon, Todd S. Ellenbecker, Jean‐Louis Croisier, Zeevi Dvir, David H. Perrin, María Stokes, Jean-Michel Crielaard, Lee E. Brown, Susan Magasi and Richard Gershon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science.

Countries where authors publish in Isokinetics and Exercise Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isokinetics and Exercise Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025