Accounting Historians Journal

662 papers and 5.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 662 papers published in Accounting Historians Journal in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Accounting Historians Journal usually cover Management Information Systems (313 papers), Accounting (256 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (56 papers) specifically the topics of Accounting and Organizational Management (311 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (212 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (105 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Accounting Historians Journal are Thomas N. Tyson, Stephen A. Zeff, Lee D. Parker, Tom Lee, Richard K. Fleischman, Dean Neu, John Richard Edwards, David Oldroyd, Alan J. Richardson and William T. Baxter.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Accounting Historians Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Accounting Historians Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Accounting Historians Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Accounting Historians Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Accounting Historians Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Accounting Historians Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accounting Historians Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025