Parallel Processing Letters

880 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 880 papers published in Parallel Processing Letters in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Parallel Processing Letters usually cover Computer Networks and Communications (612 papers), Hardware and Architecture (359 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (230 papers) specifically the topics of Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (315 papers), Interconnection Networks and Systems (265 papers) and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (239 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Parallel Processing Letters are Andrew Adamatzky, John Michalakes, Manish Vachharajani, Christian Lengauer, Selim G. Akl, Diana Quinlan, Andrew Grimshaw, Tobias Grosser, Andrew Lumsdaine and Michel Raynal.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Parallel Processing Letters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Parallel Processing Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Parallel Processing Letters.

Countries where authors publish in Parallel Processing Letters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Parallel Processing Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Parallel Processing Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Parallel Processing Letters more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025