The Journal of American Culture

702 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 702 papers published in The Journal of American Culture in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of American Culture usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (156 papers), Sociology and Political Science (145 papers) and Cultural Studies (103 papers) specifically the topics of Media, Gender, and Advertising (45 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (44 papers) and Latin American and Latino Studies (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of American Culture are Marshall W. Fishwick, Ray B. Browne, John Lawrence, Arthur G. Neal, Giselinde Kuipers, Kathy Merlock Jackson, Ian Reilly, Samuel A. Chambers, Anne Kustritz and Ronald Paul Hill.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of American Culture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of American Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of American Culture.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of American Culture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of American Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of American Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of American Culture more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025