Heike Holbig

1.1k citations
34 papers · 529 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Heike Holbig

28 papers receiving 454 citations

Peers

Heike Holbig
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Political Science and International Relations 321
  • Development 42
  • Sociology and Political Science 347
  • Communication 35
  • Anthropology 26
Replace Steven Heydemann with:
Steven Heydemann United States
F. Gregory Gause United States
Catherine M. Conaghan Canada
Sandra Halperin United Kingdom
Frédéric Mérand Canada
Gero Erdmann Germany
George W. Baer United States
Henry Hale United States
Mona M. Lyne United States
Francesco Cavatorta Ireland
Heike Holbig relative to Steven Heydemann United States Steven Heydemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Steven Heydemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Heike Holbig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heike Holbig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heike Holbig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heike Holbig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heike Holbig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heike Holbig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heike Holbig. The network helps show where Heike Holbig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Heike Holbig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Heike Holbig Line = papers co-authored together Heike Holbig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010108
2 201363
3 200459
4 200943
5 202036
6 200631
7 201630
8 201129
9 200925
10 201417
11 202116
12 200815
13 200210
14 20188
15 20107
16 20186
17
Civil Society Work in China: Trade-Offs and Opportunities for European NGOs
20184
18 20233
19
Lokalverwaltung in der VR China Zum Wandel parteistaatlicher Kontrollstrukturen seit 1979
20013
20 20223

About Heike Holbig

Heike Holbig is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Development, General Health Professions and Cultural Studies, having authored 34 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (17 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (12 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (5 papers), International Development and Aid (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (2 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (321 citations), Development (42 citations), Sociology and Political Science (347 citations), Communication (35 citations) and Anthropology (26 citations). Heike Holbig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Bruce Gilley, Robert Ash, Sighard Neckel, Amrita Narlikar and Johannes Plagemann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, Critical Asian Studies, Journal of Chinese Political Science, Democratization and The Chinese Journal of International Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact