Oxford Journal of Law and Religion

285 papers and 640 indexed citations i.

About

The 285 papers published in Oxford Journal of Law and Religion in the last decades have received a total of 640 indexed citations. Papers published in Oxford Journal of Law and Religion usually cover Political Science and International Relations (190 papers), Sociology and Political Science (132 papers) and Law (130 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (94 papers), Religious Freedom and Discrimination (83 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oxford Journal of Law and Religion are Effie Fokas, Tamir Moustafa, Joanna Shapland, Heiner Bielefeldt, John Braithwaite, Ian Leigh, John Milbank, M. Crouch, Brian J. Grim and Jim Giles.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Oxford Journal of Law and Religion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Oxford Journal of Law and Religion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oxford Journal of Law and Religion.

Countries where authors publish in Oxford Journal of Law and Religion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oxford Journal of Law and Religion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oxford Journal of Law and Religion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oxford Journal of Law and Religion more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025