Journal of the Institute of Conservation

210 papers and 764 indexed citations i.

About

The 210 papers published in Journal of the Institute of Conservation in the last decades have received a total of 764 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of the Institute of Conservation usually cover Archeology (143 papers), Conservation (129 papers) and Earth-Surface Processes (39 papers) specifically the topics of Conservation Techniques and Studies (125 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (82 papers) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the Institute of Conservation are Peter Brimblecombe, Ken Sutherland, Jonathan Ashley‐Smith, David Thickett, Glenn Wharton, Paul Garside, Karen Thompson, Margaret J. Smith, Xiaomei Zhang and Willeke Wendrich.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of the Institute of Conservation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the Institute of Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the Institute of Conservation.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of the Institute of Conservation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the Institute of Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the Institute of Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the Institute of Conservation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025