Osaka Journal of Mathematics

2.1k papers and 17.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Osaka Journal of Mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 17.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Osaka Journal of Mathematics usually cover Geometry and Topology (1.1k papers), Mathematical Physics (967 papers) and Applied Mathematics (621 papers) specifically the topics of Geometric and Algebraic Topology (376 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (288 papers) and Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (273 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Osaka Journal of Mathematics are Manabu Harada, Toshiki Mabuchi, Norihito Koiso, Ryoichi Takagi, Jun Murakami, Takashi Komatsu, Yasuhiro Fujita, Akio Kawauchi, Yoshihiko Yamamoto and Masatoshi Fukushima.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Osaka Journal of Mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Osaka Journal of Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Osaka Journal of Mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in Osaka Journal of Mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Osaka Journal of Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Osaka Journal of Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Osaka Journal of Mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025