Obstetrics & Gynecology Science

1.6k papers and 8.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Obstetrics & Gynecology Science in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Obstetrics & Gynecology Science usually cover Obstetrics and Gynecology (544 papers), Reproductive Medicine (389 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (375 papers) specifically the topics of Uterine Myomas and Treatments (210 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (176 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (157 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Obstetrics & Gynecology Science are Young Ju Kim, Eun Jin Kwon, Jinju Kim, Soo‐Young Oh, Young Min Choi, Cheong‐Rae Roh, Suk‐Joo Choi, Ramkumar Menon, Byung Chul Jee and Abdulla A.‐B. Badawy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Obstetrics & Gynecology Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Obstetrics & Gynecology Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.

Countries where authors publish in Obstetrics & Gynecology Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Obstetrics & Gynecology Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Obstetrics & Gynecology Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Obstetrics & Gynecology Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025