Advances in natural and technological hazards research

11.0k citations
837 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Advances in natural and technological hazards research

758 papers receiving 9.8k citations

Peers

Advances in natural and technological hazards research
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Earth-Surface Processes 2.0k
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 3.2k
  • Geophysics 3.2k
  • Global and Planetary Change 3.6k
  • Atmospheric Science 2.6k
Replace Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology with:
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology United Kingdom
Mathematical Geosciences United States
Earth Surface Dynamics United States
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment United States
Advances in geosciences Germany
Frontiers of Earth Science China
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science Japan
The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science Egypt
Natural Hazards Review United States
GSA Today United States
Advances in natural and technological hazards research relative to Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology United Kingdom Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Advances in natural and technological hazards research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in natural and technological hazards research more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research.

About Advances in natural and technological hazards research

The 837 papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research in the last decades have received a total of 11.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research usually cover Earth-Surface Processes (157 papers), Geophysics (248 papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (205 papers), Atmospheric Science (156 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (168 papers) specifically the topics of earthquake and tectonic studies (210 papers), Landslides and related hazards (184 papers), Geological formations and processes (129 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (111 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (90 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (77 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (48 papers) and Seismology and Earthquake Studies (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in natural and technological hazards research are Fausto Guzzetti, Alberto Carrara, Francesca Somma, Mauro Cardinali, Paola Reichenbach, Thomas Glade, Michael K. Lindell, Nobuo Shuto, Martin Gocht and Annegret H. Thieken.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact