Advances in natural and technological hazards research

10.1k citations
829 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Advances in natural and technological hazards research

753 papers receiving 9.0k citations

Peers

Advances in natural and technological hazards research
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Earth-Surface Processes 2.1k
  • Geophysics 3.2k
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2.8k
  • Atmospheric Science 2.5k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.9k
Replace Mathematical Geosciences with:
Mathematical Geosciences United States
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology United Kingdom
Earth Surface Dynamics United States
Frontiers of Earth Science China
Advances in geosciences Germany
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science Japan
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment United States
Swiss Journal of Geosciences Switzerland
International Journal of Speleology United States
The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science Egypt
Advances in natural and technological hazards research relative to Mathematical Geosciences United States Mathematical Geosciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Mathematical Geosciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Advances in natural and technological hazards research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in natural and technological hazards research more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research.

About Advances in natural and technological hazards research

The 829 papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research in the last decades have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Advances in natural and technological hazards research usually cover Earth-Surface Processes (159 papers), Geophysics (247 papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (203 papers), Atmospheric Science (157 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (167 papers) specifically the topics of earthquake and tectonic studies (210 papers), Landslides and related hazards (182 papers), Geological formations and processes (130 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (111 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (91 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (79 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (47 papers) and Seismology and Earthquake Studies (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in natural and technological hazards research are Alberto Carrara, Fausto Guzzetti, Mauro Cardinali, Paola Reichenbach, Michael K. Lindell, Nobuo Shuto, Annegret Henriette Thieken, Bruno Merz, Martin Gocht and Chang–Jo F. Chung.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact