npj Science of Learning

281 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 281 papers published in npj Science of Learning in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in npj Science of Learning usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (135 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (91 papers) and Education (74 papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (33 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (30 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in npj Science of Learning are Susanne Vogel, Lars Schwabe, Gregory M. Donoghue, John Hattie, Chloë Marshall, Owen D. Jones, Wickliffe C. Abraham, David L. Glanzman, Kate Nation and Denis Paré.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in npj Science of Learning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in npj Science of Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in npj Science of Learning.

Countries where authors publish in npj Science of Learning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in npj Science of Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in npj Science of Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites npj Science of Learning more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025