npj Regenerative Medicine

370 papers and 9.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 370 papers published in npj Regenerative Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations. Papers published in npj Regenerative Medicine usually cover Molecular Biology (174 papers), Surgery (136 papers) and Genetics (58 papers) specifically the topics of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (88 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (55 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in npj Regenerative Medicine are Bruno Péault, Joshua M. Hare, Mark F. Pittenger, Arnold I. Caplan, Donald G. Phinney, Dennis E. Discher, Dianne Little, Thomas L. Jenkins, Nadia Rosenthal and William Chang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in npj Regenerative Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in npj Regenerative Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in npj Regenerative Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in npj Regenerative Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in npj Regenerative Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in npj Regenerative Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites npj Regenerative Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025