The Nurse Practitioner

3.0k papers and 18.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in The Nurse Practitioner in the last decades have received a total of 18.4k indexed citations. Papers published in The Nurse Practitioner usually cover General Health Professions (476 papers), Epidemiology (389 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (323 papers) specifically the topics of Nursing Roles and Practices (175 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (58 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Nurse Practitioner are Brigit VanGraafeiland, Linda Lindsey Davis, Nancy E. Dirubbo, Carolyn Buppert, Teresa A. Free, Cheryl Cummings Stegbauer, Connie H. Coralli, S. Jean Emans, Marc R. Laufer and Donald P. Goldstein.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Nurse Practitioner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Nurse Practitioner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Nurse Practitioner.

Countries where authors publish in The Nurse Practitioner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Nurse Practitioner. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Nurse Practitioner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Nurse Practitioner more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025