Novum Testamentum

1.3k papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Novum Testamentum in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Novum Testamentum usually cover Religious studies (1.0k papers), Sociology and Political Science (586 papers) and Archeology (434 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (975 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (529 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (318 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Novum Testamentum are J. K. Elliott, G. D. Kilpatrick, J. P. Louw, Eugene A. Nida, Gordon D. Fee, A. F. J. Klijn, Bernd R. Fischer, Rebecca Weber, David Noel Freedman and R. McL. Wilson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Novum Testamentum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Novum Testamentum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Novum Testamentum.

Countries where authors publish in Novum Testamentum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Novum Testamentum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Novum Testamentum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Novum Testamentum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025