New Zealand journal of psychology

357 papers and 6.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 357 papers published in New Zealand journal of psychology in the last decades have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations. Papers published in New Zealand journal of psychology usually cover Clinical Psychology (115 papers), Sociology and Political Science (72 papers) and Social Psychology (69 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (27 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (16 papers) and Disaster Management and Resilience (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Zealand journal of psychology are Marc Wilson, Chris G. Sibley, Paula Brough, Dianne Gardner, Roger Openshaw, John Read, James H. Liu, Rachel Morrison, Jarrod Haar and Carla Houkamau.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New Zealand journal of psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Zealand journal of psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Zealand journal of psychology.

Countries where authors publish in New Zealand journal of psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Zealand journal of psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Zealand journal of psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Zealand journal of psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025