This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neuropathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neuropathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neuropathology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Neuropathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neuropathology.
About Neuropathology
The 2.0k papers published in Neuropathology in the last decades have received a total of 31.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Neuropathology usually cover Neurology (773 papers), Genetics (449 papers), Neurology (340 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (373 papers) and Developmental Neuroscience (73 papers) specifically the topics of Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (367 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (275 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (249 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (218 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (175 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (142 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (121 papers) and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neuropathology are Mari Yoshida, Hitoshi Takahashi, Koichi Wakabayashi, Masahito Yamada, Seung Up Kim, Takaaki Kirino, Renpei Sengoku, Hiroaki Miyajima, Fumiaki Mori and Hiroko Ohgaki.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.