Countries where authors publish in Nephron Physiology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nephron Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nephron Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nephron Physiology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nephron Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nephron Physiology.
About Nephron Physiology
The 287 papers published in Nephron Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 8.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Nephron Physiology usually cover Nephrology (55 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (48 papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (19 papers), Biochemistry (9 papers) and Molecular Biology (84 papers) specifically the topics of Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (57 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (25 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (15 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (15 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (14 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (13 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (12 papers) and Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nephron Physiology are Frank Thévenod, Ivan Sabolić, Günter Wolf, Fuad N. Ziyadeh, Ewout J. Hoorn, Grégory Jacquillet, Robert Zietse, Marc Cougnon, Philippe Poujeol and Michel Tauc.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.