Nanotechnology Perceptions

174 papers and 382 indexed citations i.

About

The 174 papers published in Nanotechnology Perceptions in the last decades have received a total of 382 indexed citations. Papers published in Nanotechnology Perceptions usually cover Biomedical Engineering (26 papers), Materials Chemistry (17 papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (14 papers) specifically the topics of Nanotechnology research and applications (11 papers), Material Properties and Applications (4 papers) and Engineering Technology and Methodologies (4 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nanotechnology Perceptions are Jeremy J. Ramsden, Elizabeth C. Theil, Mukul Kumar, Philip Thomas, László B. Kish, J. Hodgkinson, A.G. Mamalis, Alan Faulkner‐Jones, Elmar K. Wolff and Greet Janssens‐Maenhout.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nanotechnology Perceptions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nanotechnology Perceptions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nanotechnology Perceptions.

Countries where authors publish in Nanotechnology Perceptions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nanotechnology Perceptions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nanotechnology Perceptions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanotechnology Perceptions more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025