Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift

270 papers and 504 indexed citations i.

About

The 270 papers published in Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift in the last decades have received a total of 504 indexed citations. Papers published in Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift usually cover Sociology and Political Science (85 papers), Social Psychology (55 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (46 papers) specifically the topics of Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research (46 papers), European and International Law Studies (23 papers) and Social and Educational Sciences (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift are Halvard Vike, Gro Birgit Ween, Knut G. Nustad, Kjell Olsen, Marianne Elisabeth Lien, Eduardo P. Archetti, Arne Kalland, John Law, Simone Abram and Ingun Grimstad Klepp.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift.

Countries where authors publish in Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025