George Williams

5.4k citations
252 papers · 3.1k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

George Williams

228 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

George Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 588
  • Transportation 280
  • Strategy and Management 278
  • Global and Planetary Change 369
  • Law 162
Replace Peter Gould with:
Peter Gould United States
Ray Bert United States
Simon Jackman United States
Martin Rein Germany
Julian L. Simon United States
Alan Kirman France
Christian Kleiber Germany
Michael D. Ward United States
John Paul Jones United States
Richard Stone United Kingdom
George Williams relative to Peter Gould United States Peter Gould's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.3×
Peter Gould · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Williams. The network helps show where George Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Williams Line = papers co-authored together George Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 252 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005308
2 2008115
3 1980111
4 198294
5 198392
6 200383
7 200175
8 198174
9 199556
10 197454
11 200052
12 201950
13 201349
14 201644
15 198642
16 201640
17 201638
18 197336
19 199936
20 198234

About George Williams

George Williams is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Sociology and Political Science and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 252 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (43 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (42 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (24 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (20 papers), Legal principles and applications (18 papers), Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (16 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (13 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (588 citations), Transportation (280 citations), Strategy and Management (278 citations), Global and Planetary Change (369 citations) and Law (162 citations). George Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John F. O’Connell, Russell K. Monson, Paul R. Kemp, Romano Pagliari, Matthew Domonkos, Ernest G. Uribe, Yu‐Chun Chang, Hani Kamhawi, Timothy B. Smith and Mark A. Stidham. Their work appears in journals such as Oecologia, Journal of Air Transport Management, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, American Journal of Botany and Journal of Propulsion and Power.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact