Utah law review

297 papers and 780 indexed citations i.

About

The 297 papers published in Utah law review in the last decades have received a total of 780 indexed citations. Papers published in Utah law review usually cover Law (100 papers), Political Science and International Relations (97 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (62 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (64 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (37 papers) and Law, Rights, and Freedoms (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Utah law review are Heather Strang, Lawrence W. Sherman, Richard E. Redding, David W. Kennedy, Daniel A. Farber, Peter J. Cohen, Brenda Cossman, Leo Beletsky, John Tehranian and Scott Matheson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Utah law review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Utah law review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Utah law review.

Countries where authors publish in Utah law review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Utah law review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Utah law review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Utah law review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025