Countries where authors publish in Magnetic Resonance
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Magnetic Resonance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Magnetic Resonance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Magnetic Resonance more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Magnetic Resonance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Magnetic Resonance.
About Magnetic Resonance
The 205 papers published in Magnetic Resonance in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Magnetic Resonance usually cover Spectroscopy (146 papers), Biophysics (43 papers), Fuel Technology (7 papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (6 papers) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (13 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (145 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (43 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (13 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (10 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Coal Properties and Utilization (9 papers), Coal and Coke Industries Research (7 papers) and Coal and Its By-products (6 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Magnetic Resonance are W.H. Wiser, Stefan Stoll, Gunnar Jeschke, Luis Fábregas Ibáñez, Gottfried Otting, Dieter Suter, Matthias Ernst, Jens Anders, Deniz Sezer and Thomas Huber.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.