Concepts in Magnetic Resonance

338 papers and 10.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 338 papers published in Concepts in Magnetic Resonance in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Concepts in Magnetic Resonance usually cover Spectroscopy (237 papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (211 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (185 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (225 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (211 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (179 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Concepts in Magnetic Resonance are William S. Price, D. I. Hoult, Jürgen Hennig, Peter B. Kingsley, Terry Gullion, Brian Antalek, Daniel D. Traficante, Kurt W. Zilm, Klaus Scheffler and Malcolm H. Levitt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Concepts in Magnetic Resonance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Concepts in Magnetic Resonance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Concepts in Magnetic Resonance.

Countries where authors publish in Concepts in Magnetic Resonance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Concepts in Magnetic Resonance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Concepts in Magnetic Resonance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Concepts in Magnetic Resonance more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025