Miscellanea Geographica

483 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 483 papers published in Miscellanea Geographica in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Miscellanea Geographica usually cover Sociology and Political Science (84 papers), Plant Science (78 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (71 papers) specifically the topics of Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (60 papers), Integrated Water Resources Management (44 papers) and Polish socio-economic development (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Miscellanea Geographica are António F. Tavares, Krzysztof Błażejczyk, Bogdan Zagajewski, Koen Meuleman, Paweł Swianiewicz, Ingvar Holmér, Anna T. Kunert, Peter Broede, Dusan Fiala and Gerd Jendritzky.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Miscellanea Geographica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Miscellanea Geographica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Miscellanea Geographica.

Countries where authors publish in Miscellanea Geographica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Miscellanea Geographica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Miscellanea Geographica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miscellanea Geographica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025