Australian Journal of Human Rights

434 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 434 papers published in Australian Journal of Human Rights in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian Journal of Human Rights usually cover Sociology and Political Science (231 papers), Political Science and International Relations (179 papers) and Law (97 papers) specifically the topics of Human Rights and Development (72 papers), International Law and Human Rights (59 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Journal of Human Rights are Bill Swannie, Helen Meekosha, Russell Shuttleworth, Steven Freeland, Justine Nolan, Sarah Maddison, Karen Soldatić, Tamara Walsh, Dianne Otto and Terry Carney.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian Journal of Human Rights

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Journal of Human Rights. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Journal of Human Rights.

Countries where authors publish in Australian Journal of Human Rights

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Journal of Human Rights. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Journal of Human Rights with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Journal of Human Rights more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025