Microporous Materials

466 papers and 17.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 466 papers published in Microporous Materials in the last decades have received a total of 17.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Microporous Materials usually cover Inorganic Chemistry (353 papers), Materials Chemistry (322 papers) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (140 papers) specifically the topics of Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (328 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (223 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (138 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Microporous Materials are Mark E. Davis, Paul B. Venuto, Cong-Yan Chen, Hong‐Xin Li, Henry C. Foley, Bernd Marler, Stacey I. Zones, Michael Stöcker, Abdelhamid Sayari and Sandra L. Burkett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Microporous Materials

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Microporous Materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Microporous Materials.

Countries where authors publish in Microporous Materials

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Microporous Materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Microporous Materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microporous Materials more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025