Countries where authors publish in MicrobiologyOpen
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in MicrobiologyOpen. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in MicrobiologyOpen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MicrobiologyOpen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in MicrobiologyOpen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in MicrobiologyOpen.
About MicrobiologyOpen
The 1.4k papers published in MicrobiologyOpen in the last decades have received a total of 29.2k indexed citations . Papers published in MicrobiologyOpen usually cover Endocrinology (135 papers), Molecular Medicine (88 papers), Ecology (330 papers), Microbiology (68 papers) and Molecular Biology (665 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (197 papers), Gut microbiota and health (144 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (137 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (125 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (124 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (109 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (87 papers) and Vibrio bacteria research studies (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in MicrobiologyOpen are John Osei Sekyere, Anthony I. Okoh, Eugene Dempsey, Catherine Stanton, Dhrati Patangia, Gregor Grass, Zhanfei Liu, Jiqing Liu, Uchechukwu U. Nwodo and Pierre Cornélis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.