Metaphysica

217 papers and 551 indexed citations i.

About

The 217 papers published in Metaphysica in the last decades have received a total of 551 indexed citations. Papers published in Metaphysica usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (160 papers), Philosophy (123 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (100 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and Theoretical Science (160 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (79 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Metaphysica are Max Kistler, John Taylor, Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson, Baptiste Le Bihan, L. Nathan Oaklander, Ingvar Johansson, Giuliano Torrengo, Jeremy Fantl, Michaël Esfeld and Francesco Berto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Metaphysica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Metaphysica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Metaphysica.

Countries where authors publish in Metaphysica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Metaphysica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Metaphysica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metaphysica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025