Mental Health Review Journal

547 papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 547 papers published in Mental Health Review Journal in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Mental Health Review Journal usually cover Clinical Psychology (271 papers), General Health Professions (259 papers) and Social Psychology (102 papers) specifically the topics of Patient and Public Engagement in Healthcare Research (140 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (88 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mental Health Review Journal are Phil Barker, Keith Foster, David Duffy, Paul M. Camic, Jane Clatworthy, Joe Hinds, Michael Clark, Sarah Hamilton, Simon Bradstreet and Angela Sweeney.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Mental Health Review Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mental Health Review Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mental Health Review Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Mental Health Review Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mental Health Review Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mental Health Review Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mental Health Review Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025