Applied Superconductivity

481 papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 481 papers published in Applied Superconductivity in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Superconductivity usually cover Condensed Matter Physics (401 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (145 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (144 papers) specifically the topics of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (398 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (126 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Superconductivity are M. Murakami, L. Dresner, T. Freltoft, Z. Han, G. N. Riley, Hiroshi Ikuta, Masami Murakami, Yoshitaka Itoh, Tetsuo Oka and Shi Xue Dou.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Superconductivity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Superconductivity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Superconductivity.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Superconductivity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Superconductivity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Superconductivity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Superconductivity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025