Manuscrito

313 papers and 498 indexed citations i.

About

The 313 papers published in Manuscrito in the last decades have received a total of 498 indexed citations. Papers published in Manuscrito usually cover Philosophy (129 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (102 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (69 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and Theoretical Science (86 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (43 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Manuscrito are Walter Carnielli, Hans‐Jörg Rheinberger, Barry Smith, Luca Ferrero, Eric Marcus, David Owen, Peter J. Lewis, Rachel Cohon, Karl Schäfer and Otávio Bueno.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Manuscrito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Manuscrito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Manuscrito.

Countries where authors publish in Manuscrito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Manuscrito. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Manuscrito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manuscrito more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025