Philosophica

257 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 257 papers published in Philosophica in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophica usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (58 papers), Philosophy (42 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (27 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and History of Science (46 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (22 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophica are Tanya Reinhart, Murray Bookchin, Liane Gabora, Jonathan Pratschke, Jon Williamson, Claus Emmeche, Diederik Aerts, Norman Geras, Peter J. Graham and Michela Massimi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophica.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025