Memory & Cognition

5.0k papers and 209.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.0k papers published in Memory & Cognition in the last decades have received a total of 209.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Memory & Cognition usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (3.5k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.3k papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.9k papers) specifically the topics of Memory Processes and Influences (1.8k papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1.1k papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (1.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Memory & Cognition are Henry L. Roediger, John M. Gardiner, Lawrence W. Barsalou, David C. Rubin, Arthur M. Glenberg, Dorthe Berntsen, James S. Nairne, Pierre Jolicœur, Marcia K. Johnson and Suparna Rajaram.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Memory & Cognition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Memory & Cognition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Memory & Cognition.

Countries where authors publish in Memory & Cognition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Memory & Cognition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Memory & Cognition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Memory & Cognition more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025