Laval théologique et philosophique

621 papers and 501 indexed citations i.

About

The 621 papers published in Laval théologique et philosophique in the last decades have received a total of 501 indexed citations. Papers published in Laval théologique et philosophique usually cover Philosophy (195 papers), Sociology and Political Science (116 papers) and Anthropology (82 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (54 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (45 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Laval théologique et philosophique are Enrique Dussel, Jean Grondin, Gilbert Hottois, Jean-Luc Marion, Wayne J. Hankey, Yvan Pelletier, John Russon, Pierre Gravel, Michel Despland and Éric Racine.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Laval théologique et philosophique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Laval théologique et philosophique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Laval théologique et philosophique.

Countries where authors publish in Laval théologique et philosophique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Laval théologique et philosophique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Laval théologique et philosophique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laval théologique et philosophique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025