LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

583 papers and 3.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 583 papers published in LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations. Papers published in LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms usually cover Urology (485 papers), Rheumatology (393 papers) and Epidemiology (163 papers) specifically the topics of Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (458 papers), Pelvic Floor Disorders (380 papers) and Urinary Tract Infections Management (162 papers). The most active scholars publishing in LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms are Hann‐Chorng Kuo, Osamu Yamaguchi, Yao‐Chi Chuang, Osamu Nishizawa, Masayuki Takeda, Yuan‐Hong Jiang, Li‐Chen Chen, Osamu Yokoyama, Tomonori Yamanishi and En Meng.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

Countries where authors publish in LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025