Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work

245 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 245 papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work usually cover General Health Professions (115 papers), Clinical Psychology (98 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (53 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (47 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (26 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work are Michael Ungar, Philip Jefferies, Lisa McGarrigle, Chitat Chan, Colin A. Ross, Hong Wang Fung, Melissa Petrakis, Aubrey Jones, Aaron Brown and Catherine E. Burnette.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025