La psychiatrie de l enfant

411 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 411 papers published in La psychiatrie de l enfant in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in La psychiatrie de l enfant usually cover Clinical Psychology (341 papers), Sociology and Political Science (146 papers) and General Health Professions (62 papers) specifically the topics of Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (308 papers), Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory (75 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in La psychiatrie de l enfant are Bernard Golse, Nicolas Georgieff, Bruno Gepner, Anne Brun, Olivier Vecho, Denis Mellier, Florian Houssier, Benoı̂t Schneider, Marie Rose Moro and Catherine Chabert.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in La psychiatrie de l enfant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in La psychiatrie de l enfant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in La psychiatrie de l enfant.

Countries where authors publish in La psychiatrie de l enfant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in La psychiatrie de l enfant. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in La psychiatrie de l enfant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites La psychiatrie de l enfant more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025