˜La œMedicina del lavoro

474 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 474 papers published in ˜La œMedicina del lavoro in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in ˜La œMedicina del lavoro usually cover General Health Professions (86 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (78 papers) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (53 papers) specifically the topics of Occupational Health and Safety Research (50 papers), Occupational and environmental lung diseases (48 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ˜La œMedicina del lavoro are Carlo La Vecchia, Gianfranco Alicandro, Alberto Baldasseroni, Miriam Levi, Vincent Haufroid, Ivo Iavicoli, Peter Hoet, Dominique Lison, R. Lauwerys and Tord Kjellström.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ˜La œMedicina del lavoro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ˜La œMedicina del lavoro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ˜La œMedicina del lavoro.

Countries where authors publish in ˜La œMedicina del lavoro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ˜La œMedicina del lavoro. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ˜La œMedicina del lavoro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ˜La œMedicina del lavoro more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025