JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

4.5k citations
347 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

155 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Rehabilitation 775
  • Occupational Therapy 203
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 171
  • Human-Computer Interaction 233
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 434
Replace IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine with:
IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine United States
International Journal of Telerehabilitation United States
Rehabilitation Research and Practice United States
Journal of Aging Research United States
Intelligent Service Robotics South Korea
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications United States
Healthcare Technology Letters United Kingdom
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Italy
Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy Hong Kong
Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine Türkiye
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies relative to IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine United States IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies.

About JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

The 347 papers published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations . Papers published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies usually cover Rehabilitation (35 papers), Occupational Therapy (12 papers), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (13 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (14 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (15 papers) specifically the topics of Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (35 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (13 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (12 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (10 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (10 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (8 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (6 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (6 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies are Francesco Amenta, Seyed Khosrow Tayebati, Syed Sarosh Mahdi, Giulio Nittari, Alessandro Peretti, Tess M. Bright, Arlene J. Astell, Dympna Casey, Fady S.K. Alnajjar and Belal Saeed Alsinglawi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact